All for Love Essay

A stir-child relationship involves a lot of complexities. Basic on the wholey, parents are prudent to deliver for their childrens needs, whether corporeal or immaterial. They are expected to bring about duties to their children in spite of per paroleal issues they have to deal with. Conversely, for children, there is the unvarying struggle to encourage their parents approval. These complexities in the parent-child relationship are illustrated in Sherman Alexies, Because My tyro Always Said He was the Only Indian who saying Jimi Hendrix vie The Star-Spangled Banner at Woodstock and D.H. Lawrences The Rocking Horse Winner. Analyses of the characters traits and motives provide a founder understanding of how these complexities affect the relationship between parents and children. In addition, plot analyses aid draw out a possible solution to the conflict. Told in the beginning person, Because My Father Always Said He was the Only Indian who Saw Jimi Hendrix Played The Star-S pangled Banner at Woostock is a short narration that duologue about a spawn-son relationship.The son named Victor, serves as the narrator, who gives a picture of his start outs relationship with him and his have by revealing his stupefys characterhis racial ideologies, hobbies, and style. In his revelation, the narrator gives a lighthearted hitch of the conflict zeroing on his yields irresponsible conduct. Citing his fathers claim that he was the exclusively Indian who watched Jimi Hendrix play the national anthem, the son certifyes his fathers uniqueness and at the same time, his hippie attitude.Likewise, his fathers appearance to famous magazines as he knocks d make an officer in defense of his political ideologies, illustrates the fathers aggressive and unwarranted nature. Moreover, the accident the father suffers from while riding a motorcycle demonstrates his adventurousness. In summate, these descriptions show signs of the fathers irresponsible behaviour, the wr ong decisions he makes passim his vivification. Particularly, the claim he makes regarding the concert of Jimi Hendrix demonstrates the tendency of the father to create and skylark himself with lies.Moreover, as Victor implies, his father is preoccupied with his own ambition and adventures, and he covers up his shortcomings by telling stories, and attributing his life-long search for meaning to his cultural origins. The father reasons out that his world an Indian affects him to behave the way he does. He uses his cultural origin to equitableify his weaknesses as a father, his obsession for music, and his peculiar behavior. Parenting proves to be a difficult task for the father, mainly because of his confinement to his own affairs, his irresponsible nature.His attempt to establish individuality makes him unable to perform his obligations to his family. His acts of jollification with his friends and continuous search for adventures show his unpreparedness and incapability to ful fill his role as a husband and father. The difficulty of becoming a good parent is likewise tackled in D. H. Lawrences story. However, unlike the personal issues that the father deals with in Alexies story, the conflict is associated with the gravels materialist disposition.Due to the extravagant life she is used to, the fuss always feels the need of the family to produce more money. flush the house is personified as someone who whispers, There should be more money. Hence, the bring is always preoccupied with the thought of prevailing money, or as she tells her son, to being lucky. The excessive materialism of the mother causes her to feel indifferent towards her children. The narrator states that robust inside, she knew that at the centre of her heart was a hard little stern that could not feel love, no, not for anybody. This indifference is what Marx (111) refers to as alienation in his Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. In simple terms, Marx implies that as peoples material needs grow, the need to produce money and to work be nonpluss greater. In this process, workers or proletarians such as the mother soon lose declare of their lives and their selves, just as they lose control of their work. Although the mother in the story is not characterized as a usual worker, her materialist needs make her a victim of the materialistic society in which she belongs.Considering this, the alienation she experiences is one that dehumanizes her, and disables her to establish emotional connection with her children. Considering the mothers attitude of living beyond their authority, the story closely mirrors Veblens (The Theory of the Leisure Class) cod of the consumerist world. As the author claims, the consumerist equate personal happiness with consumption and the buy of material things. In his Theory of the Leisure Class, the author discusses that people scourge money and resources in order to display a higher location than others.In the story, the family lived in a pleasant house, with a garden, and they had discreet considerations. Although they cannot return such luxury, the parents maintain a high standard of living in order to feel superior to their neighbors. Acknowledging the need to produce more money, the mother works secretly in town, designing dresses for women. Even this effort of the mother reflects her consumerist attitude. As Veblen views, for the consumerist, the womans role is limited to that of a house wife, as this would show off a mans success.In the story, the wife works secretly in order to pretend that the family has enough means support their needs. As Veblen proposes, by not allowing the wives to take outside professions, a man could show off his economic status, although in the story, these are all a facade invented by the mother. Like the father in Alexies story, whose individuality seems to come first before all aspects in the world, the mother possesses a selfish attitude, which considers ev erything alright as long as her material needs are met. This submission to material things illustrates nothing but her selfishness. concord to Stebbins (82-83) the person who has the least interest in continuing the relationship unremarkably possesses the greater power and is most liable to resort to exploitative behavior. In the two stories, we see the parents as those who are less interested to last out their relationship with their children. In The Rocking-Horse Winner, the selfishness of the mother is best reflected in her request to force the full amount that capital of Minnesota secretly endows her. Although the mother uses the money to provide better education to her children, these are all due to her pride, her ambition to be regarded as superior to their neighbors.Moreover, her disinterest to find out whoever bequeaths her the big sum proves her ingratitude and materialist disposition. Furthermore, her insensitivity to her sons condition, the fact that the three collabo rators, the son, the uncle, and the servant are able to continue their deals without the knowledge of the family, provides a more unmistakable proof of the selfish nature of the mother. As the story relates, the selfish behavior of the mother drives the son to eagerly and desperately cheer her. Snodgrass (191) offers Freudian analyses of Pauls character, claiming that the sons effort to win his mothers affection is Oedipal in nature.However, one whitethorn note that there is no established feud between Paul and his father. In fact, not ofttimes is said about the father therefore, this claim cannot be fully established. Nevertheless, by dint of the selfishness of the mother, one may see why the son becomes obsessed in the betting game. Ultimately, it is the mothers materialistic ambition that drives the son to absorb in the betting habit. It is in addition that, which leads him later to lose his senses. It can be noted that during their conversation, when Paul inquires about lu ck, the mother points out,Its what causes you to have money. If youre lucky you have money. Thats why its better to be born lucky than rich. If youre rich, you may lose your money. But if youre lucky, you will always get more money. This statement makes the son put on the importance of money and luck. As the mother equates luck with having money, the son struggles to find luck in order to please his mother. As the narrator reveals, the children in the house feel the indifference in the look of their mother.Thus, Paul, imbued by a sons inherent desire to gain approval and be loved, forces himself to be lucky. More than the competition that some critics establish between the father and the son, it is the sons emotional needs that move him to create something to please the mother. The same need for affection and approval motivates Victor. As he illustrates the sacrifices he and his mother bear just to please his father, one gets the notion of a one-way relationship where the father i s at most on the advantage. The attending Victor gives his father justifies this notion.Specifically, his effort to listen and learn his fathers music, the acquired love for Jimi Hendrix, and the mere belief that his father was the only Indian who watched Hendrixs performance of the Star-Spangled Banner attest to the sons struggle to win his fathers affection, and to keep the bond between them. The problem of triumphant their parents affection is very visible in the two stories. Although this issue may look petty for some, it is revealed to be a serious issue in the two stories, especially The Rocking-Horse Winner. As the story shows, this conflict is what makes Paul go insane, rocking his work horse unceasingly until it gives him the idea of who will win the race. At first, one can imagine that the habit of the son may just be a simple game he plays, but at the end, as the mother witnesses his son rocks his toy horse like a madman in the middle of the night, one can sense the ps ychological aggrieve that results from the childs longing for his mothers love. The behavior and illness that the son shows at the end demonstrate the psychological damage he undergoes.Particularly, as the races draw near, the child develops some disturbance to come up with a forecast of who will win the race. As he already loses in the first two races, his anxiety grows worse, realizing that he has only one chance left to win during the season. As such, the simple anxiety then grows worse into a General Anxiety Disorder (GAD), alter his whole system, making him unable to sleep and eat, gain consciousness, or in other words, continue with his normal life. In addition to GAD, psychologists may also agree that Paul develops psychological play.According to Franklin (Psychology Information Online), psychological play is an impulse control problem which consists in persistent maladaptive gambling that creates serious life problems for the individual. It is different from recreation al gambling in that it affects disadvantageously the way one lives, suggesting failure to function normally as an individual. As the story portrays, Paul seemingly lose his senses as he rocks his toy horse in the middle of the night. He also shows abnormal behavior as he repeats, Malabar, the name of the horse that will win the closing race.