Sunday, February 24, 2019

Reading Response on “Murder on the Orient Express” by Agatha Christie Essay

This obligate is about a detective who boards a train to a have a vacation, however one of the passengers were kill during the night. Therefore, Hercule Poirot interviews everyone to try find the murderer.I re altogethery enjoyed this account take for as it got me crack who the murderer is right way through the keep. When I read this book again a found a few clues that I barely read over without noticing them. For example, Mary Debenham says Not now. Not now. When its all over. When its behind us. Then, to Colonel Ar onlyhnot. At this moment Poirot, Mary and Arbuthnot are the unless passengers aboard the train. This is important intimate relationship between Mary and Colonel Arbuthnot is jealous because the two seem like strangers to each other. Even though it is unreadable what Mary is talking about, it is a bit suspicious as what leave be over. When the events start unfolding, Mary and Colonel refuse to tell Poirot what they were talking about.This book made me think of p eople in general and their identity. In the beginning(a) two sections, all the passengers seem correct but in the tertiary section, their identities are revealed. Most of the passengers tell the truth about their names but not their profession or association with the victim. Some of the passengers changed their namesThis book also made me think about justice, as Ratchette was a problematic person and kidnapped the Armstrongs daughter but is found not guilty, so 12 passengers who are associated with the Armstrong family have a plan to kill him to decorate things right. It made me think how sometimes life can be cheating(prenominal) but is it good to avenge someone, especially if they are innocent? This book shows that if it was for the better, then it is fair.

No comments:

Post a Comment